120 years ago the controversial Adolf Dreyfus case started in France. A Jewish
officer was accused of spying for Germany. The process was accompanied by an
anti-Semitic pogrom campaign initiated by right-wing circles. In
pre-revolutionary Russia, monarchists and nationalists accused socialists of
being treacherous "Jews" - sold to the Japanese or German intelligence services. Nazis
accused their political opponents that they were sold to the Bolsheviks,
"American plutocrats" and, of course, the ‘world Jewry’. During the Stalinist terror,
thousands of citizens were labeled as paid agents of all imaginable foreign services.
The same tactics were used by McCarthyites in the U.S., and the Putin regime in
Russia today has often resorted to similar arguments: “Why does the opposition
organize protests? Because they are hired by America, ‘gay Europe’
or "hostile" Georgia”.
Political crisis in Ukraine, which has resulted in a real propaganda war, has
followed the same logic in some of the Western media. Linus Valtersson
published an article last week, which states that "pro-Russian
protests" in Kharkiv and other cities of East Ukraine are organized by
activists of the left organization "Borotba" (Struggle).
The sources of this information are a few activists of several groups that
actively participated in Kiev protests. A few days ago, one of those activists,
Denis Pilash, was beaten in the center of Kiev by his right-wing
"comrade" in common struggle
for "democratic future". "Look, a living communist" - shouted
the rightwing ‘comrade’ while trampling down the pavement his
"ally". This
episode – not the first in a series of acts of ultra-right violence – is reminiscent
of the position that
"democratic left" had
in the Maidan movement of Kiev. And, unfortunately, such a position cannot be called honourable.
In the Maidan protests, which took place from the end of November, hundreds of
thousands of people participated. But their organizing core was a union of
three right-wing parties, one of which - "Svoboda" (Freedom) – is a
neo-Nazi party. In addition, the radical protest movement formed a paramilitary
wing consisting of activists of extremist Nazi sects united in a coalition
called "Pravy Sektor" (Right Sector). Under these circumstances, open
left agitation among supporters of
Maidan could not take place. Public space and access to the stands and
microphones were under strict control. Many on the left who tried to intervene
were abused by the Nazis, no matter if they supported the Maidan or not.
Anti-communist slogans became some of the most popular in the rhetoric of the
protest movement and were directed not only agianst the representatives of the
official Communist Party, but also against all left-wingers. The latter could
only passively join the movement, therefore, sharing the responsibility for the xenophobic and
anti-Semitic sentiments of Maidan
leaders and their propaganda clichés.
After the overthrow of Yanukovych regime, the epicenter of the protests quickly
moved from the capital to the Russian-speaking south-east of Ukraine, as the
new government immediately accused the new protesters of separatism and
collaboration with the external enemy. It is much easier to attribute mass
discontent to intrigues of foreigners than to discuss its real reasons.
However, many facts indicate that the situation is much more complicated than
what the new Ukrainian rulers present to their supporters.
There are many real reasons to account for the discontent in the South East.
Odious oligarchs were immediately appointed governors of several provinces.
Massive wage delays and wage cuts began, as well as rapid price rises.
Decisions were taken for multiple tariff rises. It is also well known that in
several cases dissidents were beaten by far-right militants. There was a wave
of attacks on Lenin monuments, as well as on monuments of revolutionary events
or of Red Army soldiers who liberated Ukraine from the Nazis. In Kharkiv the
Nazis opened fire and killed two people; they were arrested but soon - released. Deputies from the
far-right party "Svoboda" staged a public beating of the director
National TV for coverage of events in Russia. There have been several attacks
on the premises of left organizations, including the Union "Borotba".
And all this took place against the background of rhetoric of social racism,
according to which people of the east of the country have been called
"cattle" and "padded jackets" (derogative for Russians).
Even without Putin, all this was enough to make thousands of people in south-
eastern Ukraine to protest.
Of all the organizations involved in the protest movement in the south- east of
the country, "Borotba " is indeed one of the most known and
influential. But unfortunately for the Kiev authorities – it is quite difficult to accuse them of separatism or of
being sympathetic to Putin or Yanukovych. This organization is in close
cooperation with the Russian "Left Front" which has become the main
target of political repression in Russia. What more, members of
"Borotba" have helped many left wing Russians to hide from the
persecution of Putin’s regime. They have also been for years consistent critics
of Viktor Yanukovych regime and have organized numerous campaigns of social
protest. Finally, in December 2013, at the beginning of the acute crisis in
Ukraine, "Borotba" has launched a campaign for the unity of the
country, which has been torn by fighting oligarchic clans. Today they are
harassed by pro-Russian nationalists in Kharkiv and Donetsk for criticizing
Vladimir Putin, for their slogans for preserving a unified Ukraine, for
publishing their own newspaper in the Ukrainian language.
In such circumstances, the propagandists of the right regime which came to
power in Kiev have no arguments other than the old accusations of collaboration
with an external enemy. But who
cares if it’s just a banal
lie? As Joseph Goebbels said, "If you say a lie big enough and then repeat
it many times, people will eventually believe it". Unfortunately, this
method of the Nazi propagandists still works.
News from Ukraine today hit the headlines of the world's newspapers. Unfortunately,
they are often presented
in the frames of a primitive
propaganda. A typical scheme of supplying information about the events is to
ensure that the pro-European supporters of democratic change resist the wiles
of Putin regime. But such a presentation of the problem raises many questions
from the very beginning.
How can they explain that in the ranks of the "progressive forces"
the nationalist extremists play a vital role? How can Putin’s regime
manipulates the majority population in the most economically developed south-
eastern regions of Ukraine, where the Ukrainian government has cut off the
Russian TV channels and in the national media censorship prevails? How can they
explain that the protesters everywhere raise social demands?
The easiest way is to start a hysterical witch-hunt for ubiquitous paid agents,
spies, and members of subversive groups, for the capture of whom the odious
Ukrainian oligarchs are willing to pay money. The government, consisted of
members of the far-right and rightwing
parties, deliberately inflames the situation. In the eastern cities the army,
as well as paramilitary nationalist units have arrived and begun to disarm the
locals. In these circumstances, the discontent and fear for the future flares
up again among the residents of Kharkiv, Donetsk, Mariupol , Lugansk, Odessa and
other southeastern cities.
In fact, Vladimir Putin and his Ukrainian opponents are ideal partners. They
use each other so that to convincingly
portray the image of the external enemy and conduct nationalist mobilizations
in their own countries, therefore,
removing from the agenda of
social issues, human rights and other controversial subjects out of sphere of public debates.
Furthermore, labeling the opposition as hirelings of foreign intelligence
services, they manage to suppress it by force, not bothering to debate with
dissenters. Only in Kharkiv (where the situation has not yet flarred up to an
armed uprising as in the neighboring Donetsk), the authorities have arrested 66
opposition activists, including journalists . Among them, however, there was not a single
citizen of Russia about the
role of which the Ukrainian TV talks so much. So
what? “The war will pay all
scores”.
Aleksey Sakhnіn
Translated by Panayiotis Tselepis
-
Економіка
Уолл-стрит рассчитывает на прибыли от войны
Илай Клифтон Спрос растет>> -
Антифашизм
Комплекс Бандеры. Фашисты: история, функции, сети
Junge Welt Против ревизионизма>> -
Історія
«Красная скала». Камни истории и флаги войны
Андрій Манчук Создатели конфликта>> -
Пряма мова
«Пропаганда строится на двоемыслии»
Белла Рапопорт Феминизм слева>>